Education Software Development Company
Transform Student Outcomes with AI-Powered Platforms
We build learning platforms and assessment tools that adapt to every student, from K-12 to enterprise upskilling, grounded in the evidence our education clients rely on.
4.9 on ClutchSOC 2 Type II150+ platforms shipped
- Compliance
- FERPA, COPPA, WCAG 2.1 AA
- Integrations
- Clever, ClassLink, PowerSchool, Canvas LTI
- Clients served
- K-12, online learning, corporate training, credentialing
- Building ed-tech since
- 2012
- Case study
- Percensys Core Learning (2022 to 2024)
The short answer
What does an education software development company build?
Reviewed November 3, 2026
An education software development company builds learning platforms, assessment engines, SIS and LMS integrations and learner analytics that meet FERPA, COPPA and WCAG 2.1 AA requirements. Codieshub has shipped ed-tech since 2012 for online learning platforms, K-12 districts, corporate training and credentialing providers, designing from the learner journey before wiring the integrations.
Education software breaks in the places that matter most: the LMS that can't handle 40,000 concurrent students during final exams, the district SIS that loses IEP records mid-year, the ed-tech platform that scores beautifully in a demo but has a 60% dropout rate in a real classroom. Codieshub builds education technology that holds up under the institutional pressures of procurement, privacy mandates, and pedagogical reality.
Since 2012 we have shipped products for online learning platforms, K-12 districts, corporate training ecosystems, and credentialing providers. We understand the compliance surface: FERPA, COPPA, WCAG 2.1 AA: and we understand the human side: learner engagement is a product problem, not just a content problem.
Our senior engineers work hours that overlap your US or UK day alongside your curriculum, product, and IT teams, so sprint reviews and incident calls happen live. The pattern: fast delivery from a team that has built LMS integrations, adaptive assessment engines, and learner analytics pipelines before.
Education Expertise
EdTech Software We Build
- 01
Learning Management Systems
Custom LMS platforms and extensions for Canvas, Moodle, and D2L: course delivery, grading, and analytics at institutional scale.
- 02
Adaptive Assessment
Adaptive testing engines and item banks that personalize difficulty to each learner, grounded in psychometric evidence.
- 03
Student Information Systems
SIS integrations, rostering standards (OneRoster, Clever), and LTI tool interoperability across your district or campus stack.
- 04
AI Tutoring & Personalization
LLM tutors, Socratic dialogue systems, and personalized learning pathways that scale 1:1 attention without replacing teachers.
- 05
Course Authoring
SCORM / xAPI-compliant authoring tools and content pipelines that help subject-matter experts publish interactive courses fast.
- 06
Proctoring & Integrity
Remote proctoring, AI-content detection, and academic-integrity tooling that stands up to enterprise-grade assessment needs.
How we approach it
From the problem you have to what done looks like.
01The problem
Most ed-tech builds underestimate two things: the complexity of institutional IT environments (single sign-on federations, SIS integrations, district-mandated data residency) and the brutality of learner attention. A platform that is technically correct but pedagogically flat will see engagement crater after week one, which is the metric every renewal decision is built around.
02How we solve it
We design from the learner journey outward: onboarding, habit formation, progress feedback, and instructor visibility, before we wire the integrations. Then we connect to your SIS (Clever, Classlink, PowerSchool, Canvas LTI, or direct API), build the FERPA-compliant data layer, and instrument every learning event so you have evidence of outcome, not just completion. Accessibility is tested from the first sprint, not added before launch.
03What done looks like
Ed-tech platforms built to renew: audit-ready FERPA controls, SIS integrations that IT departments can stand behind, and learning-event instrumentation that gives administrators the outcome evidence renewal conversations require. We build for high course-completion rates and design reporting dashboards so the data is legible when it matters, not assembled the week before a contract review.
Why Codieshub
Six things you can hold us to.
Specific to Education, and written into how every engagement runs.
- 01
FERPA and COPPA by default
Privacy controls, parental consent flows, and data-retention policies designed in from week one, not audited in after a district legal review flags them.
- 02
Deep SIS and LMS integrations
Rostering via Clever and Classlink, LTI 1.3 for LMS embedding, PowerSchool and Skyward connectors. The institutional plumbing that makes adoption stick.
- 03
WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility
Tested with assistive technology across each sprint: because accessibility is a procurement gate in K-12 and higher ed, and retrofitting it is expensive.
- 04
Engagement-led architecture
Learning event instrumentation, adaptive pacing hooks, and progress feedback patterns designed to support completion, built into the product from the first sprint, not added as a post-launch layer.
- 05
Built for institutional scale
Load-tested for concurrent district rollouts, multi-tenant for multiple schools or districts from one codebase, with role-based access for learners, instructors, and admins.
- 06
Outcome reporting that drives renewal
Dashboards that show mastery trends, time-on-task, and cohort comparisons. The evidence administrators need to approve contract renewals and expansions.
Proof
“They took feedback seriously, refined the details, and made sure our content and workflows were presented in a way that really works for our learners and admins.”
“An external team can be just as committed and driven as our internal one. Their dedication and attention to detail have made them invaluable.” John Bradford, PetScreening
“We move fast and deal with a lot of edge cases. They kept up without cutting corners, which is rare. The team stayed responsive across time zones.” Oliver Dlouhy, Kiwi
Related work
- Percensys Core Learning · Education · 2022-2024Learner & Admin Workflows for Percensys
- Eddy · Education · 2024-2025EdTech SaaS for Eddy
- PetScreening · Real Estate · 2017-2019SaaS Platform That Scaled to 21% MoM Growth
- Saudia Cargo · Transportation & Logistics · 2024-2025Logistics SaaS for Saudia Cargo
- CRDN · Property Restoration · 2017-2019Property Restoration SaaS for CRDN
Ways to work with us
Four ways to engage. One senior bench.
Start with one shape and switch when the scope shifts. Month to month, no multi-year lock-in.
FAQ
What buyers ask on the first call.
A senior engineer reviews your learning platform requirements (integrations, compliance, and engagement architecture) in one call.
Scope my ed-tech buildFERPA compliance runs through the data model, not just a checkbox: we define what counts as PII and educational records on day one, restrict access to authorized school officials, build parent/guardian consent flows for platforms serving under-18 learners, and log all access to student data with retention policies your legal team can review. We have delivered against the security questionnaires that K-12 districts and state education agencies send during procurement.
Yes, SIS and LMS integrations are a core competency. We build LTI 1.3 tools for Canvas, Blackboard, and Moodle; rostering integrations via Clever and Classlink; and direct API connectors to PowerSchool, Skyward, and Infinite Campus. Most district rollouts need at least two of these working on day one, so we scope them as first-class deliverables, not afterthoughts.
A focused MVP with one learning flow (course, assessment, or credentialing), SSO and a basic instructor dashboard falls in our MVP / Prototype range: $25K to $60K over 4 to 8 weeks. Full platforms with adaptive content, SIS integration, parent/guardian portals and analytics are Production Application builds at $60K to $200K over 3 to 5 months, and district-wide or multi-system programs move into our Enterprise range of $200K+ over 6 to 12 months. Timeline depends heavily on the integration surface. We provide a written scope with milestones and comparable projects we've shipped.
We instrument learning events from the first sprint (logins, content starts, pauses, completions, assessment attempts) so you have real engagement data within weeks, not months. We design onboarding flows to minimize time-to-first-value, build progress indicators and mastery feedback into the UX, and set up A/B instrumentation so you can test content delivery approaches. Engagement metrics are part of our definition of done, not a post-launch wish.
Yes. We have built adaptive assessment engines that adjust question difficulty based on learner performance, personalization layers that surface the right content path at the right time, and AI-assisted features like writing-prompt feedback and quiz generation. These are built on top of a solid learning-event store so the model has real signal, not cosmetic AI layered on a static content tree.